Monday, January 24, 2022

Notes on Studying Culture

from Living By the Book, Howard G. Hendricks and William D. Hendricks. 

An Application on Applying the Six Keys to Observation - Who, What, Where, Why, When, and How.

Geography

  • Where is the culture, geographically?
  • What is the land and climate like, and how does it affect them?
  • How do people travel across their land?
  • How long do families stay in one place?  
  • What land has been inherited for generations?
  • Who have been displaced?
  • What locations feature prominently in the culture's history?
  • Where have the wars been fought?
  • Where are celebrations held?
  • What monuments and memorials are there?
  • What geographical assets are there?

Power

  • Where are the centers of power?
  • Who's in charge?
  • How do they get that way?
  • How does it change?
  • How effective are they?
  • Who makes decisions locally vs regionally?
  • Who exerts influence even though they're not in power?
Communication
  • What are the means of communication?
  • How is it distributed?
  • Who controls the media?
  • Why do they control, it and not someone else?
  • How is credibility determined?
Economics
  • What place does money have in a culture's values?  Why?
  • How do people earn a living?
  • With whom does a society trade?
  • What resources do they have, and what do they lack?
  • How much of society has access to water, electricity, telecom, and the internet?
  • Is there upward mobility?
  • What tech do they have?
  • How many are poor, and how does that influence the culture?
Ethnicity
  • What people groups make up the culture, and where do they come from?
  • What history, traditions, and values do they bring?
  • How is society organized -- who is at the top?
  • What racial barriers affect everyday life?
Gender Roles
  • What do men vs women do, and what tensions accompany that?  Why?
Family
  • What value does the culture place on family?
  • How are families structured?
  • Who are the key families?  Where do they live?  What are their histories?
  • How do they maintain influence?  How do they pass down power to the next generation?
  • How are the young educated and socialized?
  • What do children represent?
  • Who represents children?
  • What are they taught?
  • Who does the teaching?
  • How long does adolescence last?
  • How does one become an adult?
  • What happens to the elderly?
Religion
  • What are the dominant religions?
  • Where did they come from?
  • What is their current condition?
  • Which groups are growing fastest, and why?
  • What philosophical assumptions do people operate from?
  • What outlook do they have about world and life?
  • What exposure to the gospel has it had, and what was the response?
Arts
  • What art is the society producing?  What place in society does the artist have?
  • What is art saying about the society?  About the world?
History
  • What legends and myths are passed down?  Why?
  • What stories are told?  Why?
  • What stories are not told?  Why not?
  • Who writes history?
  • How do people measure time?



Tuesday, December 7, 2021

Notes About Covenant and "Non-Covenant" Theologies

A common mistake made by Reformed pastors is to dismiss non-covenant theologies because it was not held from antiquity.  But they're not serious, because they've forgotten the 14th and 15th centuries.

The primary marker for Proto-Covenant Theology is infant baptism.  If your church baptizes infants, it's because your church believes it is a physical continuation of Israel, the heir of the promises made to Israel.  This practice dates to at least 215 AD. Thus by the reports of at least some Early Church Fathers, including Iraneus, Origen, and Justin Martyr (155 AD), the Church generally believed itself to be the heir of the promises to Israel; one sign of that is that baptism replaced circumcision. Once the two ideas were linked, then infant baptism followed naturally.

In opposing Rome, Wyclif, Hus, and the Reformation began the long road of dismantling Christendom. This opposition came from Biblical literacy. Everyone should learn the Bible well enough to examine oneself with it.  It didn't automatically solve problems; instead, it allowed reasoned, prayerful dialogue. It commands patience and humility. 

But in denying the temporal authority of the Church, you begin to realize that replacement is nuanced. Then in reading the Bible on your own, you see that Paul's motif is not quite replacement, but actually fulfillment -- of the law's requirements by Christ, which Israel could never fulfill. Yet Paul wasn't really a replacement theologian, because he also believed in the idea of the remnant: that a believing remnant of Jews will become partakers of the New Covenant of Christ.

The primary marker for this theology is credo-baptism.  And the way it's maintained is through biblical literacy.



Monday, October 4, 2021

Why Priests? by Garry Wills

 Some notes as I was reading his book.

---

The Point: What is the Body of Christ?

Wills' argument is that the Roman Catholic Church has reversed the place of Eucharist and Congregation: the congregation is now the symbol, and the eucharist the reality, wheras originally it was the other 'way 'round.  This seems to me to apply to other churches that have priests.
  1. 1 Cor 10:18, 12:27: we are one body
  2. 1 Cor 11:29: They've forgotten what the Body of Christ is!
  3. de Lubac -> the church is the physical manifestation of the Body of Christ.
(note: Wills quotes a lot of liberal Catholic theologians, some of whom have theology that diverges from the Bible.  He apparently quotes them when they are making points Biblically.  Be careful.)

What is the Eucharist then?

A Thanksgiving
A celebration of the peoples' oneness at the "one altar"
Augustine: can the body of Christ be digested?
1 Cor 10:17

It's Not About the Pope

[Rob's notes]

The church with a single representative, moral leader, top executive e.g. monepiscopacy or whatnot is not anti-biblical.  Wills' argument is that the priesthood is a non-Christian import that subverts the body of Christ.  He claims to still be a Catholic and expresses no intention of leaving.  He points out that Protestant churches seem to do fine without priests, so in his view the Roman Catholic Church would similarly "be fine without priests."  

The absence of priests would also jettison the consecrations they perform; in Wills' view this is better than what the CC has today.  He thinks that one of the effects of the priesthood is, paradoxically, to isolate the members of the Body of Christ rather than fostering one-anotherness.  

The Classical Pagan Position on Christianity

"Christianity can't be a religion, because it has no priests, no altars, no designated places of worship."

What is a Christian Priest?

  
It's more or less completely described as the one who consecrates the Eucharist.

Contra Catholic Interpretation of the Eucharist

(P.S. everyone agrees that Aristotle is not infallible (Aquinas knew this too))

Not agreed on by Doctors and teachers of the CC.
  • Augustine ("it's a symbol of our unity in Christ")
  • de Lubac in his work Corpus Mysticum
  • Berengar
  • Occam
  • Ratrammus
  • Origen "the bread is the Word of Christ"
It's a reversal of the relationship, putting Eucharist over Body.

[Rob] Eucharist looks like a fiat rather than a logical chain.
[Rob] Looks like a symbol for control rather than unity.


First Generation Christianity (1G) 

had EKKLHCIAE ("house gatherings").

  1. charisms, including apostles
  2. communal meal where memories of Jesus were shared (the gospels now fill that function).
  3. prayer, prophesy (< using OT and elaborating to communicate gospel)
  4. composed their own hymns
  5. baptized newcomers

There were no consecreations.

There were no priests, because Jesus and his Apostles didn't ordain any.

Apostles

The sending out of the apostles between churches explains Paul's urging for hospitality.

- Mk 6:7, Rom 12:13, Heb 13:2, 2 Cor 8:23.

NOTE: "The Twelve" is clearly a symbol of the End Time, as judges of the 12 tribes in the End Time.

- Lk 22:28-30, Mt 19:28, Rev 21:10-14.

Christians' Names for Themselves

  • Housefellows (Gal 6:10, Eph 2:9)
  • Followers
  • Learners 
  • Following "The Path"
  • Jesus as DIDASKALE or rabbi
  • Brothers and Sisters (ADELPHOI and ADELPHIA)
  • The Called (KLHTOI)
  • The Holy
  • Those In Messiah

The 1G was Egalitarian and Charismatic

"Community functions are direct gifts of the Spirit", not by hierarchical rules or appointments.

Rom 12:7-8, Eph 4:11 "shepherd"

Egalitarian: Mk 9:33-37, Lk 14:7-11, Mt 23:5-12.

- Rob's note: this looks apparently temporary both as a sign and for practical purposes as the Church establishes itself.

The 2G was Self-Supporting

(Actually I don't have a good heading title here)
The 2G had:
  1. Deacons and Deaconesses (helpers)
  2. Elders (PRESBYTEROI) (functional)
  3. Overseers (moral)

The 2G did not have:

  1. Priests
  2. Rituals that require priests

1 Cor 11:18-22, 27-29.  Priests and consecration aren't front-and-center.  They aren't anywhere.  It's all on the congregation.  There is no Ex opere operato.

Jesus was a Prophet, by definition

  • Harsh critic of ritual that was only ritual.
  • Charismatic, not appointed.
  • Used visible metaphors.
  • Directly confronted the priests.
  • Killed by the priests.

Atonement

God made atonement for man, because He loved us.

Rom 3:24-26
- sin, yes
- blood of Christ, yes
- atonement, yes

but NO:
- no priest
- no sacrifice offered
- no bargaining with God

Redemption

Based solely on Christ's completed work on the cross.



Monday, January 9, 2017

Blended Creed

We believe in God, the Father Almighty, the Creator,     [Neh 9:6-10]
   and in our Lord Jesus Christ, His one and only Son,               [Jn 3:16]
      truly God and truly man, inseparable and indivisible.     [Jn 1:1]
   By Him all things were made,                              [Col 1:16]
   and He upholds all things.                                [Heb 1:3]
 
He was conceived of the Holy Spirit,                         [Mat 1:18]
      born of the Virgin Mary.                              [Mat 1:23]
   He was like us in His humanity, but without sin.          [Heb 4:15]
   He revealed the Father's will to all,                     [Mat 11:27]
   was crucified and died for our sins,                      [1 Cor 15:3]
   was buried, and was raised up on the third day.           [1 Cor 15:4]

He ascended into heaven                 [Acts 1:9-12]
   and sits at the right hand of God,    [Luke 22:69, Col 3:1]
   mediating the new and everlasting covenant of grace.      [Heb 8:6]
   He will finish the good work He began in His chosen ones. [Phil 1:6]
   He shall return to judge the living and the dead.  [2 Tim 4:1]

In Him we have the forgiveness of sins,        [Eph 1:7]
   reckoning His righteousness to His chosen ones,           [Rom 4:5]
   and He shall not lose any whom the Father has given Him,  [Jn 6:39]
      but will resurrect them on the last day.   [John 6:40]

We believe in the Holy Spirit,
   who regenerates and indwells His chosen                   [Titus 3:5]
      as a promise of life everlasting with Him.             [2 Cor 1:22]

We believe in one church,                                 [Eph 4:15-16]
   in the communion of all believers,                    [Eph 2:20-21, 1 Pet 2:4-5]
   governed by the rule of faith of His apostles,            [Rom 12:6]
      which was translated into the New Testament,
    which illuminates the Old Testament.

Amen.

Monday, August 22, 2016

Early Church Fathers on the Scriptures

Leaders of all churches in all eras exercise authority: when you join a church, you pledge to toe the line.  You agree with their non-negotiables, and you agree to be bound by their particulars which are still considered negotiable.  Even heretical churches do this.

The ECFs validated their authority based on lineage and faithfulness to that lineage's teaching.

Culled from: http://www.reformedapologeticsministries.com/2014/03/the-church-fathers-taught-sola-scriptura.html


Examples from that blog follow.

I. Ambrose (330-397)

A. Scripture is the foundation of church leaders and councils

"Further, that none may fall into error, let a man attend to those signs vouchsafed us by the holy Scripture, whereby we may know the Son" (Ambrose, Of the Christian Faith, Book I, Ch. 2, s16).

“For how can we adopt those things which we do not find in the holy Scriptures?” (Ambrose, On the Duties of the Clergy, Book I, Ch. 23, 102).

“So indeed, following the guidance of the Scriptures, our fathers declared, holding, moreover, that impious doctrines should be included in the record of their decrees, in order that the unbelief of Arius should discover itself, and not, as it were, mask itself with dye or face-paint” (Ambrose, On the Duties of the Clergy, Book I, Ch. 18. 119).

“I do not wish that credence be given to us; let the Scriptures be quoted” (Saint Ambrose: Theological and Dogmatic Works, The Sacraments of the Incarnation of Our Lord, Chapter 3, p. 224).

B. Scripture is clear on salvation

“Wherefore the Scripture plainly has called that life which is blessed, eternal life. It has not been left to be appraised according to man's ideas on the subject, but has been entrusted to the divine judgment” (Ambrose, On the Duties of the Clergy, Book II, Ch. 1, 3).

“…let us now note how clearly the divine Scriptures explain a thing about which we see philosophers held so many involved and perplexing ideas” (Ambrose, On the Duties of the Clergy, Book II, Ch 3, 8).

C. Scripture is Clear on the Trinity

“God, then, is One, without violation of the majesty of the eternal Trinity, as is declared in the instance set before us. And not in that place alone do we see the Trinity expressed in the Name of the Godhead; but both in many places, as we have said also above, and especially in the epistles which the Apostle wrote to the Thessalonians, he most clearly set forth the Godhead and sovereignty of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit” (Ambrose, On the Holy Spirit, Book III, Ch. 14. 94).



II. Hippolytus of Rome (A.D. 170 – 235) 

A. Scripture is the source of our piety

“There is, brethren, one God, the knowledge of whom we gain from the Holy Scriptures, and from no other source…all of us who practice piety will be unable to learn its practice from any other quarter than the oracles of God” (Hippolytus, Against Noetus, Ch. 9).

B. Churches have customs and practices

“Now, driven by love toward all the saints, we turn to the essence of the tradition which is proper for the churches. This is so that those who are well instructed may hold fast to the tradition that has continued until now, and fully understanding it they may stand the more firmly…” (Gregory Dix, The Treatise on the Apostolic Tradition of St. Hippolytus of Rome, Bishop and Martyr, [SPCK, 1937], p. 7).

Hippolytus then goes on as a manual for church practice.  In other words, for him, the order of the worship service, ordaining clergy, catechesis, baptism, etc was what he meant by tradition.

[Although maybe he didn't write that particular treatise!]

C. Scripture is clear enough when you read it in context

“But let him quote the passage as a whole, and he will discover the reason kept in view in writing it” (Hippolytus, Against Noetus, Ch. 4).



III. Cyril of Jerusalem [A.D. 313 – 386] 

A. Salvation depends on Scripture
-and-
B. Scripture is the foundation of creeds, traditions, councils, chatechism, etc

"For concerning the divine and holy mysteries of the Faith, not even a casual statement must be delivered without the Holy Scriptures; nor must we be drawn aside by mere plausibility and artifices of speech. Even to me, who tell you these things, give not absolute credence, unless thou receive the proof of the things which I announce from the Divine Scriptures. For this salvation which we believe depends not on ingenious reasoning , but on demonstration of the Holy Scriptures” (Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, 4.17).

C. Our faith and teachings are founded on the Scriptures

“…the faith…has been built up strongly out of all the Scriptures” (Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, 5.12).

“Now mind not my argumentations, for perhaps you may be misled but unless thou receive testimony of the Prophets on each matter, believe not what I say: unless thou learn from the Holy Scriptures…” (Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, 12.5).

D. Believers interpret Scripture

“for the indwelling Spirit henceforth makes your mind a house of God. When you shall have heard what is written concerning the mysteries, then will you understand things which thou knew not” (Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, Prologue, 6).


IV Irenaeus [A.D. ? – 202] 

A. The plan of salvation is in the Scriptures
B. Curated by the will of God [via church leaders]

“We have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the Gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 3. 1. 1).

C. Content must be proven from the Scriptures

“Such, then, is their [Gnostics] system, which neither the prophets announced, nor the Lord taught, nor the apostles delivered, but of which they boast that beyond all others they have a perfect knowledge. They gather their views from other sources than the Scriptures” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 1. 8. 1).

D. Scripture purposefully has perfectly plain passages
E. Scripture interprets Scripture

“all Scripture, which has been given to us by God, shall be found by us perfectly consistent; and the parables shall harmonize with those passages which are perfectly plain; and those statements the meaning of which is clear, shall serve to explain the parables; and through the many diversified utterances [of Scripture] there shall be heard one harmonious melody in us, praising in hymns that God who created all things” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 2. 28. 3).

F. Scripture is clear

“…the entire Scriptures, the prophets, and the Gospels, can be clearly, unambiguously, and harmoniously, understood by all…” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 2.27.2).

G. The Reglua Fidei is a Scriptural Creed

‘But again, when we refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, and which is preserved by means of the successions of the presbyters in the Churches, they object to tradition, saying that they themselves are wiser not merely than the presbyters, but even the apostles, because they have discovered the unadulterated truth’ (Against Heresies Book III, Chapter 2, Article 2)

[...and Iranaeus tells us what that tradition is next...]

“…carefully preserving the ancient tradition, believing in one God, the Creator of heaven and earth, and all things therein, by means of Christ Jesus, the Son of God; who, because of His surpassing love towards His creation, condescended to be born of the virgin, He Himself uniting man through Himself to God, and having suffered under Pontius Pilate, and rising again, and having been received up in splendor, shall come in glory, the Savior of those who are saved, and the Judge of those who are judged, and sending into eternal fire those who transform the truth, and despise His Father and His advent. Those who, in the absence of written documents, have believed this faith, are barbarians, so far as regards our language; but as regards doctrine, manner, and tenor of life, they are, because of faith, very wise indeed” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 3.4.2).

H. The Apostles' tradition is a creed built on Scripture

"The Church, though dispersed through our the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: [She believes] in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His [future] manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father to gather all things in one, and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Savior, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, every knee should bow. . . . For, although the languages of the world are dissimilar, yet the import of the tradition is one and the same” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, I. 10. 1, 2)


V. Justin Martyr: Scripture is clear enough

“Pay attention, therefore, to what I shall record out of the holy Scriptures, which do not need to be expounded, but only listened to” (Justin Marty, Dialogue of Justin, Ch. 55)

VI. John Chrysostom (A.D. 347-407): Prove it from Scripture

“I exhort and entreat you all, disregard what this man and that man thinks about these things, and inquire from the Scriptures all these things” (John Chrysostom, Homilies on Second Corinthians, Homily 13).

VII. Lactantius (A.D. 240-320): Scripture has it all

“we have divine testimony for everything” (Lactantius, The Divine Institutes, Book III, Chapter I).

VIII. Athanasius (A.D. 296-373)

A. Scripture is sufficient

“…the sacred and inspired Scriptures are sufficient to declare the truth” (Athanasius, Against the Heathen, Part 1.1)

B. Scripture has authority over councils

“Vainly then do they run about with the pretext that they have demanded Councils for the faith's sake; for divine Scripture is sufficient above all things; but if a Council be needed on the point, there are the proceedings of the Fathers, for the Nicene Bishops did not neglect this matter, but stated the doctrine so exactly, that persons reading their words honestly, cannot but be reminded by them of the religion towards Christ announced in divine Scripture” (Athanasius, Councils of Ariminum and Selucia, Part I History of the Councils, 6).

IX. Theophilus of Antioch (d. A.D. 181): Scripture is clear

“For those who desire it, can, by reading what they uttered, accurately understand the truth” (Theophilus of Antioch, Theophilus to Autolycus, Book 2, Chapter 35)

X. Hilary of Poitiers (A.D. 300-368): Scripture is clear

“My prime object is by the clear assertions of prophets and evangelists to refute the insanity and ignorance of men. . . “ (Hilary of Poitiers, On the Trinity, Book.I.17).


Friday, March 25, 2016

Philippians 2 and discussing theology


Geoff Volker shows how Philippians 2, John 13, Ephesians 4, and 1 John 4 explain that the way believers disagree with one another should be an example to the world of God's sacrificial love.

http://idsaudio.org/ids/pdf/applied/discuss.pdf

Monday, February 29, 2016

Star Wars Redeemed: Your Life-Transforming Journey with Jesus and the Jedi

It's brilliant that someone capitalized on Star Wars to present the gospel so well.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B01A1LGWA4/ref=tsm_1_fb_lk

Is your Christian life like Luke’s disappointed gaze to the horizon? Do you find your lack of faith disturbing? When you read the Bible, is it as confusing as the plot of The Phantom Menace?

Well, go strap yourselves in and get ready for a biblical blast off!

If you’re a follower of Jesus and a big Star Wars fan, then this is the book for you! Star Wars Redeemed teaches the powerful truths of God’s Word using the backdrop of Star Wars. Have fun exploring some of the themes, metaphors, motifs, scenes, characters, and dialogue from the first six Star Wars films while learning some of the most difficult-to-understand subjects in the Bible.

In Star Wars Redeemed, you will find the answers to the following questions:

 • Is it possible to find God’s will for my life?
 • Does God’s control have limits?
 • How can I know if I’m saved?
 • What’s the purpose of the Church?
 • How can I arm myself for spiritual warfare?
 • Is speaking in tongues possible?
 • Does God care how I vote?
 • What about the “End Times”?

 It’s all in here and more! Don’t listen to your inner “Uncle Owen.” It’s not such a long way from here.